Skip to main content
Radiation and Tissue Expander; What Should I Know? | DIEP Flap Dallas Forth Worth, Austin & Oklahoma City, OK

Radiation and Tissue Expander; What Should I Know?

Written by Breast Reconstruction Associates on . Posted in Mastectomy Radiation, Radiation Therapy.

The indications for radiation therapy after mastectomy may include larger tumor size, nodal metastasis, or involved or close surgical margins.  In some scenarios, the need for radiation is known prior to the mastectomy, and in other cases, it’s not determined until after the mastectomy, when the final pathologic stage is determined.

Occasionally, a tissue expander, which is a temporary implant, may be used as a placeholder at the time of the mastectomy to allow for further cancer treatment, i.e. chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy.  The tissue expander helps preserve more skin on the chest wall and creates a temporary breast mound during cancer treatments so that you feel and look normal in clothing.

After all the treatments are concluded, the tissue expander is then exchanged for either an implant or tissue-based reconstruction.  Patients who elect to have a permanent implant placed are at higher risks for both short-term and long-term complications.  Short term complications include infection and extrusion of the implant while long term risks include an accelerated progression to capsular contracture.  Tissue-based reconstruction offers a safer alternative for patients requiring radiation therapy after a mastectomy as the overall complications do not differ from non-radiated patients.

The decision to use a tissue expander is unique to each patient as it is influenced by the overall cancer treatment plan.  Please contact us at Breast Reconstruction Associates so we can work with you, your breast surgeon, and your radiation oncologist to determine the best reconstruction strategy.

FAQs

A tissue expander is a temporary implant placed at the time of mastectomy to preserve chest wall skin and create a temporary breast mound, allowing patients to look and feel normal in clothing while undergoing cancer treatments like chemotherapy or radiation.

Radiation may be recommended for patients with larger tumor sizes, lymph node metastasis, or surgical margins that are involved or close to cancerous tissue.

Not always. In some cases, the need for radiation is known before mastectomy, but in others, it’s determined only after surgery once the final pathologic stage is assessed.

Once all cancer treatments are finished, the tissue expander is exchanged for either a permanent implant or tissue-based reconstruction, depending on what’s best for the patient.

? Patients choosing a permanent implant face higher short-term risks like infection and implant extrusion, as well as long-term risks such as accelerated capsular contracture.

Yes. Tissue-based reconstruction is generally considered safer for patients who have undergone radiation, as overall complication rates are comparable to those of non-radiated patients.

The decision is highly individualized, based on the overall cancer treatment plan, and involves collaboration between the patient, breast surgeon, and radiation oncologist to determine the most appropriate reconstruction strategy.

The differences between a Lumpectomy with Radiation Therapy and a Mastectomy with Reconstruction

Written by Breast Reconstruction Associates on . Posted in Mastectomy Radiation, Radiation Therapy.

Lumpectomy vs Mastectomy – What’s the difference?

A lumpectomy, or ‘partial’ mastectomy, is the removal of only a portion of the breast – specifically the tumor and a normal rim of breast tissue immediately surrounding the tumor. This is an option for cancer treatment and is followed by breast radiation to lower rates of recurrence. The combination of ‘lumpectomy + radiation’ is frequently referred to as ‘breast conservation therapy’ or ‘BCT’.

A mastectomy is the removal of the entire breast. In many cases, this eliminates a patient’s need for radiation therapy.

Cancer considerations

The size and location of a breast tumor determine if a patient is a candidate for breast conservation therapy.  When considering BCT, breast surgeons are weighing complete clearance of cancer with the maintenance of an aesthetically satisfactory breast.  Though a mastectomy is always an option to treat breast cancers, most breast surgeons treat more than 50% of patients with breast conservation therapy.

When deciding between these two approaches, patients are counselled that BCT and mastectomy have equivalent outcomes with regards to survival, but that BCT is associated with a higher rate of local recurrence.

Cosmetic Considerations

In general, when deciding between these two approaches, reconstructive surgeons are focused on optimizing the aesthetics of the breast, including consideration of volume, shape, and symmetry. 

If you are a candidate for either surgical option, the tumor size and breast size are the main variables we consider when determining the most optimal cosmetic approach for you.

If the tumor is small and the breast is large, then only a small percentage of the breast would need to be removed.  In such a case, BCT is often a good choice.  If needed, the other breast can be reduced or lifted for purposes of symmetry. It is important to note, that the final appearance of the cancer breast may be impacted by radiation therapy.  In the long-term radiation can cause volume loss and skin tightening of the breast, these changes can impact symmetry over time.

For women with small or moderate sized breasts, even a small tumor could require removal of a significant amount of the total breast volume, leading to a breast deformity or significant asymmetry. In such cases, a mastectomy with reconstruction may provide a better cosmetic result. A balancing breast lift of the other breast can also be performed simultaneously for symmetry purposes. In some circumstances, radiation can be avoided after mastectomy, which eliminates the possibility of future asymmetry caused by radiation.